Comments on: Happy 200th Birthday Charles Darwin http://www.jewelisms.com/2009/02/12/happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin/ life, the universe, and whatever else strikes me Mon, 08 Mar 2010 12:47:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: jewel http://www.jewelisms.com/2009/02/12/happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-264 jewel Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:03:28 +0000 http://www.jewelisms.com/?p=475#comment-264 Good question. Probably not, I'd wager. Good question. Probably not, I’d wager.

]]> By: The Chemist http://www.jewelisms.com/2009/02/12/happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-263 The Chemist Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:53:59 +0000 http://www.jewelisms.com/?p=475#comment-263 Sometimes, I can't help but wonder if Darwin would have his own day if the creationists hadn't been so adamant. Sometimes, I can’t help but wonder if Darwin would have his own day if the creationists hadn’t been so adamant.

]]> By: jewel http://www.jewelisms.com/2009/02/12/happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-262 jewel Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:41:18 +0000 http://www.jewelisms.com/?p=475#comment-262 You're very probably correct. I do hope the references prove useful to you. They have to me. I'll check out that National Geographic. Thanks! You’re very probably correct. I do hope the references prove useful to you. They have to me.

I’ll check out that National Geographic. Thanks!

]]> By: Alan in Upstate NY http://www.jewelisms.com/2009/02/12/happy-200th-birthday-charles-darwin/comment-page-1/#comment-261 Alan in Upstate NY Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:52:48 +0000 http://www.jewelisms.com/?p=475#comment-261 I fear most folks who dismiss evolution are unlikely to look into the facts, but thanks for the references. I could certainly be better prepared for the occasional encounters with the people arguing against it. The latest (February) National Geographic has two good articles - "Darwin's First Clues" and "Modern Darwins," and the December issue had "The Man Who Wasn't Darwin," about Alfred Russell Wallace. Clear skies, Alan I fear most folks who dismiss evolution are unlikely to look into the facts, but thanks for the references. I could certainly be better prepared for the occasional encounters with the people arguing against it.

The latest (February) National Geographic has two good articles – “Darwin’s First Clues” and “Modern Darwins,” and the December issue had “The Man Who Wasn’t Darwin,” about Alfred Russell Wallace.

Clear skies, Alan

]]>